Measuring CFC impact across its portfolio
Despite its broad scope, it can be challenging to report Impact Measurement using the SDG framework. Since the monitoring of the targets is done on a national and on a global level, it may be challenging to attribute the contribution of a particular organization in advancing specific goals. Currently, there is no official guideline for the private sector and the civil society to report on their work related to the SDGs.
To overcome these difficulties, it is necessary to convert the SDG framework in specific indicators. Having considered the different options available, the CFC decided to adopt the Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS+) as its main reporting tool. IRIS+ is a catalogue that pulls together the most useful metrics from across the impact investing industry, making it easier to create a system to measure performance. It is managed by the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) and is the most used tool for impact investors to report on their impact.
After an in-depth assessment, the CFC has mapped the most relevant IRIS+ metrics with its core SDGs. As result, the CFC has determined the main indicators to be monitored by its projects in line with its mission.
Implementing the impact strategy
The development impact is one of the major criteria for selection of interventions receiving CFC support. Each project received through the Open Call for Proposals is expected to provide indicators of its intended impact. Starting with the 13th Call for Proposals in 2018, the CFC asks all proponents to present the estimated impact of their projects using the SDG framework. More specifically, they are required to describe how their project would contribute to the advancement of the core CFC SDGs. The proponents need to express the target impact indicators for each year of their projects and their baseline values using the IRIS+ metrics. They are also expected to provide details of how project activities contribute to the core SDGs targeted by the CFC. Projects which are unable to provide such information are normally not recommended for further consideration during the screening stage.
The impact indicators are checked by the CFC at the due diligence stage and are included in the project agreement between the CFC and the project proponent. The project agreement assures that the project will aim to achieve the intended outcomes and will report specific impact indicators, as agreed with the CFC. This information is provided to the CFC on an annual basis. Consistent and regular impact reporting alongside with financial indicators is a distinguishing feature of the CFC Impact Strategy.
The CFC collects diverse information regarding the impact of its projects over their life cycle while seeking to minimize the overhead burden on the operational, organizational, and human resources. The CFC follows a robust approach covering impact indicators and impact measurements requiring project proposals to include:
- Target Indicators: The indicators should clearly demonstrate the intended level of achievements for each year of the project. The CFC expects that these will be systemically assessed and reported by the proponent, demonstrating that the implementation plans are feasible and not based in unrealistic assumptions;
- Baselines: Baseline levels for impact indicators should be included in the proposals. The CFC reviews and compares baseline data with other sources, e.g. similar projects;
- Data on achievements: The CFC systematically follows up the achievements of its supported projects to ensure timely and accurate reporting of the progress and impact. The follow up procedures are introduced, and project proponents are informed of the consequences of incomplete or late reporting on the implementation and eventual success of the project;
- Monitoring and Evaluation: Selective monitoring and evaluation for individual projects may be included but is generally constrained by the financial and human resources made available by the project proponents. The current focus of the CFC is on developing a practical approach for monitoring and evaluation across the entire CFC project portfolio;
- Financing of Project: Projects receiving CFC support frequently include larger financial institutions as co-financiers. Combining resources and technical facilities of the CFC with co-financiers enables more intense and detailed impact monitoring.
Social and Environmental Management System
Besides measuring the positive impact its projects help to create the CFC understands the importance of also considering the potential social and environmental risks of its operations. For this reason, the CFC has partnered with the Social Finance Programme of the International Labour Organization to develop its Social and Environmental Management System (SEMS).
Such systems are designed to enable a financial service provider to identify social and environmental risks associated with a particular transaction and take this into account when deciding whether or not to provide financing as well as identifying opportunities to improve social and environmental performance.
The CFC has always considered the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risks when assessing a project. This analysis is included in the entire process of evaluating a new proposal, from the initial screening of the applications received to the ongoing monitoring of an active project. However, recognizing the great importance and complexity of this topic, the CFC decided to take a step further, aligning its procedures to the current best practices from the impact investment industry, by developing its own SEMS.
With the support of the ILO, the CFC has developed several tools and procedures to consider systematically the social and environmental risks of potential projects. These tailor-made tools take into account the specific set-up of the CFC, the sectors it operates and cover all steps of CFC investment process. The main outcome of this project was the approval of CFC’s Sustainability Policy by the Executive Board, setting the standards for the social and environmental risk analysis of CFC operations.
Impact measurement: an on-going work
The CFC recognizes that the impact investing sector is still developing a proper and robust system to allow all investors to manage and monitor their impact. The sector has actively taken up the challenge of measuring social impact and has made good progress in recent years, with the emergence of new tools, frameworks, and standards. However, there is still a long way to go until there are agreed parameters as comprehensive and reliable as those used for risk and return on the traditional financial market.
The CFC acknowledges these limitations and tries to give its contribution for the sector to progress towards a robust impact management practice. In this regard, the Fund engages with several relevant stakeholders in field and tries to keep up to date with the sector best practices.
For its own impact management practice, the CFC understands that an interpretation of the impact metrics is best complemented with an analysis of the context in which the project operates, to provide a more complete picture of social performance. Standalone numbers cannot by themselves indicate positive or negative social value, or necessarily be compared across companies or products. That is why the Fund also builds close working relationships with the projects and intends to eventually carry out more detailed qualitative and quantitative studies on a sample of investments. This combined approach is the basis from which the Fund can communicate a credible story of its SDG impact. Also, as the Fund learns from these experiences it will be able to invest more effectively by identifying and assessing sectors, regions and financial instruments which are instrumental in creating and having more practical impact.